Instructions from Covidence for bulk uploading PDFs, using Zotero, EndNote or Mendeley:
Bulk uploading is in beta - you may find it easier to upload PDFs for full text screening or data extraction one at a time; or add a DOI or other link to full text instead of a PDF.
NOTE: UBC reviewers are cautioned to NOT upload the full-text of articles obtained through UBC Library subscriptions or document delivery to Covidence due to licensing and copyright restrictions. Full text of publicly available articles may be uploaded. Please contact the Copyright Office at ( copyright.services@ubc.ca) with any questions regarding sharing licensed intellectual property.
To efficiently add PDFs to Zotero for uploading to Covidence:
1. Select multiple references in your library, right click, and choose "Find Available PDFs." This will find open access PDFs as a batch.
2. For PDFs not found by step 1, use Library Lookup:
-In Zotero Preferences (found under Edit in PC version), go to Advanced. In the OpenURL section, add: https://gw2jh3xr2c.search.serialssolutions.com
-Next, select a single reference in your library. Click the green arrow button, then "Library Lookup."
This will take you to the Citation Linker page for the article, which will link you to full text, or if unavailable will link you to the Interlibrary Loan order form. For these articles, in line with copyright restrictions above please share a link to full text in Covidence rather than uploading the PDF.
To more easily find full text of articles, download the Library Access browser extension.
Reviews are typically updated one year after the initial search. This is not a required timeframe and some reviews update with less or more than one year having passed. It is also common to update a review right before a publication submission if the screening and extraction have taken a substantial amount of time.
There are many ways to update database searches for systematic, scoping and related reviews (see McGill’s guide).
Updating with Covidence (using a new Review):
Note: Date indexing in databases is notoriously unreliable. Some articles will receive retroactive indexing and other dates will reflect the date of entry into the database rather than date of publication. Using RIS files and deduplicating from the original search result set is a way to circumvent this, although it is not perfect (i.e. completely transparent and reproducible).
Updating with Covidence (using your existing Review):
Note: If your team manually de-deduplicated in the original review in Covidence, this won't track into the new review and imports. Your team can either keep it as-is for the sake of de-duplicating the new RIS or de-deduplicate the manual titles again to be thorough.
Track with Tags:
When you export study lists from Covidence, the tags are included in a separate column.